Open post

Promotional Materials Management

Pain Points

  • Mid-sized specialty pharmaceutical company received six warning letters in a four-year span from the FDA as a result of a highly ineffective process to approve promotional materials internally
  • Communication and interaction between various Marketing groups and the Medical, Legal and Regulatory departments was strained
  • A new promotional materials management process was designed by an outside vendor but had not yet been implemented
  • New process rollout also coincided with the rollout of a new customized IT system built for the review and approval of promotional materials
  • High anxiety was present at the organization as a result of the departure from the “old way” of approving promotional materials

Our Solution

  • Cross-functional key change agent “Champions” team was identified and assembled to ensure the new process was followed within their respective business groups
  • Performed resourcing analysis and recommended additional Commercial Operations department headcount
  • Communications Strategy and Plan were developed
  • Initiative logo and tagline were created and embedded in marketing vehicles to create awareness internally
  • Stakeholders were identified to assist with the dissemination of targeted messages coming out of the Communications Plan
  • Team-building events were coordinated to optimize the new process and improve the organizational dynamics of the promotional materials reviewing teams
  • A reward program was established to recognize high performers and reinforce positive behaviors

Benefits Realized

  • Champions team structure put in place was “highly effective and helped enormously in circulating clear, properly branded messages” that highlighted the new process benefits and ensured two-way communication and feedback
  • Role clarity, improved personal relations, team-work and communication between the Medical, Legal, Marketing and Regulatory departments “made a big difference in improving the quality of the submissions”
  • Promotional materials were managed more “smoothly and efficiently” resulting in less issues down the line
  • Adoption of the new process resulted in “quantifiable improvements to process metrics and palpable improvements in the culture”
  • Number of warning letters from the FDA was significantly reduced to zero throughout the four years following the implementation of the new promotional materials management process

Joe Nassif

Practice Leader

Contact Joe to learn more about how we can help you succeed.

Open post

Global Labeling Process

Pain Points

The Regulatory Affairs department at a specialty pharmaceutical company was having difficulties developing content for their labels, getting consensus on labeling changes, keeping track of updates and ensuring label changes were implemented. In addition to internal frustrations with an undefined and unclear labeling process, the situation presented a compliance risk for the organization. We were tasked to develop a cross-functional labeling process to mitigate these risks.

Our Solution

In collaboration with regulatory leads, we developed an end to end cross-functional labeling process to ensure an efficient and compliant process. Elements of the end-to-end labeling process included:

  • Clearly defined triggers for labeling development or updates
  • Clearly defined roles and responsibilities for labeling team members
  • Roles and responsibilities for governance teams and committees
  • Tools to be used in the development of the labels, quality checking and proofing, decision tracking and implementation monitoring

Benefits Realized

In addition to many other non-tangible benefits, the Regulatory Affairs department:

  • Was able to develop a business case for a stand-alone labeling department to manage the global labeling process
  • Updated all labels using the newly defined process
  • Had a streamlined process for label development that everyone followed
  • Reduced the risk of inaccurate or inappropriate statements in their labels

Simbai Mudzamba

Practice Leader

Contact Simbai to learn more about how we can help you succeed.

Open post

Post-Merger Technology Integration

Pain Points

Our client had recently acquired a smaller pharmaceutical company and needed a strategy to ensure data and R&D systems from the legacy organizations was properly integrated.

Our Solution

In collaboration with system and business process owners from the legacy R&D and IT functions, our consultants developed a strategy and roadmap for integration. Our team:

  • Identified and mapped all legacy systems and their owners
  • Identified data contained in systems and some that was not in the systems
  • Identified the business processes supported by the systems
  • Documented gaps and limitations of each system
  • Using the information we collected, we developed an integration roadmap and strategy that identified the systems to be sunsetted, how data was going to be integrated, and the plans and schedule for transitioning. In addition, the team highlighted the business processes that were going to be impacted by the integration strategy for the organization to develop appropriate contingency plans.

Benefits Realized

In addition to many other non-tangible benefits, the R&D organization:

  • Initiated a step-by-step plan to transition information
  • Transitioned in a compliant manner with limited disruption to business activities
  • Consolidated redundancies to develop single sources for business critical information

Andre Zeibari

Practice Leader

Contact Andre to learn more about how we can help you succeed.

Open post

Labeling Function Development

Pain Points

Our client's R&D organization, specifically the regulatory affairs department, did not have clearly defined roles and responsibilities for developing content for labels, managing the label development process and maintaining approved labels. This created a compliance risk, inefficiency in the end-to-end labeling process and a lack of organizational control of labels for our client.

Strategy Solution

In collaboration with regulatory leads, we were tasked with developing a strategy for the management of the end-to-end labeling process. A major component of the strategy was a business case for a function to manage and control the labeling process. The solution we developed included:

  • Newly defined functional and individual labeling roles and responsibilities
  • High-level benchmarking of organization of labeling departments at other organizations
  • Internal resource assessment and analysis for optimal resourcing of the labeling function
  • A solid business case for a new labeling function within the regulatory affairs department

Benefits Realized

In addition to many other non-tangible benefits, the regulatory affairs department:

  • Launched a new global labeling function responsible for all labels
  • Deployed new tools and technology that improved the efficiency of label development
  • Adopted one source of contact and accountability for labels

Simbai Mudzamba

Practice Leader

Contact Simbai to learn more about how we can help you succeed.

Open post

Process Documents Harmonization

Pain Points

Our client was struggling with managing the standard operating procedures and working instructions their staff where supposed to follow. Their function was assigned many SOPs, some of which were not relevant to their activities. In many cases, the SOPs which were applicable to their function had varied levels of detail, in some cases had activities and steps which did not make sense to the function. In addition to internal frustrations with having to read and sign SOPs with unclear activities, the situation presented a compliance risk for the organization as many employees began to either ignore SOPs or read and sign but not use the SOPs.

Our Solution

In collaboration with the process, training and compliance lead for the function, we convened a team of employees from representative departments and developed a framework for them to assess assigned SOPs. The assessment included checking for applicability to their function and accuracy of assigned activities. Specifically, we led the team in:

  • Reviewing every SOP and identified activities that were applicable to their function
  • Eliminating SOPs that were not applicable to their function and combining some SOPs
  • Assigning SOPs to specific departmental roles
  • Developing an engagement model for the function to interact with the compliance department and the overall SOP development process

Benefits Realized

In addition to many other non-tangible benefits, the function:

  • Reduced the number of SOPs their employees had to read and sign while reducing compliance risk
  • Streamlined the process for providing subject matter expertise input to SOP development teams

Simbai Mudzamba

Practice Leader

Contact Simbai to learn more about how we can help you succeed.